> > BTW; Steve and I were on a live talk with Leica people yesterday, and we > tried to squeeze information on the R10. > Philippe, could you tell us more? It would be extremely interesting. Thanks, Miha 2009/5/22 AMARD philippe <philippe.amard@xxxxxxxx> > I didn't know - but it is not so surprising as the Leicaflex may have > been thought of as the heir to the M series. > > BTW; Steve and I were on a live talk with Leica people yesterday, and we > tried to squeeze information on the R10. > One of them answered us that asking questions about an R10 was, I quote, > 'vaporware'. > So the heir/R deceased before the parent. > Sad news. > > Enjoy the SL while there's film around. > Bien cordialement > Philippe > > > On Fri, 22 May 2009 19:07:40 +0200 > Miha Golobic wrote: > > Dear flexers, > > I'm passing you (as suggested by Doug Herr) my newly > >discovered findings on > > the Leicaflex SL viewfinder: > > > > I have just recently discovered another virtue of the > >SL: the magnification > > of the viewfinder, combined with a 50mm lens (summicron, > >in my case) gives * > > identical* magnification and brightnes as the naked eye. > >In other words: it > > is very easy to use both eyes open when composing a > >photo. With some > > practise, you see *one* 3D picture, and a undistracting > >black frame (the > > viewfinder). And because of the nature of the microprism > >(a split prism > > would be a distraction), it is very easy to focus in > >that way, too. > > > > Of course, this only works with a 50mm lens. I somehow > >believe that the > > magnification and the viefinder arrangement was done > >with this practice of > > taking photographs in mind, yet I have not noticed > >anyone would mention > > that. Have anyone else noticed this? > > > > > > Best regards, > > Miha > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/