[LRflex] Re: Foul Language (or just a linguistic foul?)
- From: David Young <dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:13:10 -0800
At 2/12/2010, you wrote:
>Hey There David,
> I have a question, possibly not a good one, but just for giggles
> I wanted to run it by the group. In your greetings to Fred Rosenberg I saw:
> > 3) Remember, personal attacks & foul language will get you a lifetime
> > ban, within minutes.
>Along with:
> > As Andy said: "It's not the tool
>It's the operator. "
>
>
>I read those two sentences in close succession and my personal
>idiosynchracies immediately led me to ask:
>
>"If a photographer forgets 'it's the operator' and thinks 'it's
>their tools' that makes them a TOOL!" would run afoul of Rule Three?
>
>No charge for the smiles &/or snickers be they be for my question or
>for having come up with such a line of thinking. :-)
>
>Richard in Michigan
Hi Richard!
You have a weird and perverted mind! I knew I liked you for a reason!!! :-)
Cheers!
---
David Young
Logan Lake, Canada.
Wildlife Photos: www.furnfeather.net
Personal Website: www.main.furnfeather.net
A micro-finance lender though http://www.kiva.org
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
