Hi Colin,=20 I read your adapter email and I recently sent this response to David Young = with a vaguely similar issue. I have a Canon 1DS MK II and in addition to a= number of Canon EF L lenses (all fine to a greater or lesser extent) I am = also using leica R manuals which I think are actually a bit better than the= Canons (based upon my very unscientific tests determined by shooting the s= ame objects manually with adapted Leica and the Canon L's of the same foca= l length and using the same lighting, etc). I got on to this email list af= ter emailing Doug Herr about the issue and he was kind enough to get back t= o me right away with some great pointers along with his Leica reviews. I mu= st say the differences between the Canon L's and the Leicas are subtle...bu= t the Leicas are a bit better both in bokeh and sharpness. I've found that = the 50mm Summicron f2 is just great and relatively cheap used particularly = since I don't care about 3 cam or ROM etc. I'm also using a 135mm Elmarit R= 2.8 2 cam which I read is not supposed to be that great.....but you couldn= 't prove that by me. I've done some superb portraits with it. I can use th= e older Leica versions that make no difference to me. And the used Leicas a= re a lot cheaper than the new EF L Canons. I like to shoot with manual focu= s if I can and in that case the Leicas aren't much different to use than th= e Canons. In some cases shooting candids that won't stand still I go the Ca= non L's but otherwise I try to use the Leicas. I've read a lot about the ad= apters available and while the Novoflex seems to be understood to be the be= st, I'm using very inexpensive Chinese versions ($US15 to $US25) and they= work just fine. I have the adapters mounted on the lenses so I'm not bugge= ring around trying to use one adapter for 4 lenses which would be a pain. A= t about $US200. for each Novoflex...I couldn't justify buying four of them = but its no prob for eight of the cheapos. Actually there are so many adapte= rs out there for the EOS that a whole new world of lenses is now available= to me and I'm looking for good M42, Carl Zeiss and Nikons in addition to = the Leicas to adapt to the 1DS. I have an old Nikon FTn collection (my firs= t 35mm) with some good Nikon lenses that I can now use easily. A number of = the Nikons are just fabulous. I have a like new Leica R3 but for a boob lik= e me.... I'm not clever or patient enough to shoot film and then wait a we= ek for processing before I see the results so I can simply adjust the 1DS f= rame by frame to get the proper exposure and I'm loving it. I've bought a n= umber of adapters from a Chinese seller and he speaks English perfectly and= the prices are great and the products are fine and I've had no problems wi= th them. If you're interested I can give you his email or you can simply go= to eBay and find someone else. They may likely be very similar. I just pur= chased a used 90mm Elmarit R 2.8 and am expecting it today. From what I've = read this should be better than the Canon 135 L (which I must say is great)= so I can't wait. =20 If anyone can add anything to this please do.=20 Good Luck,=20 Harry =20 > Colin Howarth asked: > >=20 > >About those adapters, any comments on EOS adapters? I've heard of =3D20 > >Novoflex (150 EUR) and CameraQuest (175 $) Then on Ebay I see Chinese = =3D20=3D > >made (Skink?) adapters for 22 EUR. >=20 >=20 > Hi Colin! >=20 > I used the Fotodiox adapter, with grea success, and could find no=20 > difference between it and the (double the price) CameraQuest adapter,=20 > though I know that Ted used the CameraQuest adapters with great satisfact= ion. >=20 > I believe that the Novoflex adapter is the best of the bunch... it is=20 > rumoured that the actual lens mount is made by the firm which=20 > supplies them to Leica. Nice springs for keeping the lens fitting=20 > well without the need for any tweaking or adjustments. (See=20 > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/getting_a_grip.htm and=20 > http://nemeng.com/leica/002f.shtml as well as:=20 > http://nemeng.com/leica/017e.shtml ) >=20 > As for the very low cost adapters, I've heard some reports that they=20 > work just fine, and others that they do not.... or work only with=20 > some lenses. It is, perhaps, an issue of price, and quality=20 > control. Sorry, no experience, here. Perhaps others can chime in,=20 > if they've tried the others. >=20 > Hope this helps! >=20 > Cheers! >=20 > --- >=20 > David Young, > Logan Lake, CANADA >=20 > Limited Edition Prints at: http://www.telyt.com/ > Personal Web-site at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/