Chris, I never say any of the prints or files from the 12mm or any other lens. I asked to test it with my 50 or 35 Summis but he had already returned it. I think the problem was vertical alignment of the RF patch. It is a reat PITA that a $3000 hi-tech camera has little mechanical faults. Maybe they have forgotten how to build mechanical cameras in Japan. I heard that the Pentax K1000 was the last camera to be assembled by a human being! Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 3:04 PM Subject: Re: Re:RD1 > Was the 50 shot wide open? This appears to be the case with the RD-1 having > a .38 RF base. Odd thing I have seen reviews where the 12mm gets better > reviews on the RD-1 than the 15mm and 21mm CV lenses. I would think the 12mm > would have even more vignetting. Guess since it is basically a 18mm lens, > the vignetting looks better?? > > I do like that the body is well built, compared to earlier CV bodies. Nice > weight. > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Lawlor" > Subject: Re:RD1 > > > > Chris, a friend of mine who own a pro camera shop got an RD1. He loved it > > with the C/V 12mm but when he put a leica 50 on it he had to send it back > > because of rangefinder problems. Bill Lawlor > > > > ========================================================= > To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe. ========================================================= To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.