Hole not centered... Remember good old record clubs? Buy one get 12? I think that they had their own pressing plants with licenses to press LP's & make tapes. I think that if a record was removed out of the press too soon & the vinyl was still too warm it got stretched making it off center. Remember RCA's ultra thin vinyl? talk about wow & flutter & tracking problems... Got to go now, I am suddenly missing my vinyl collection... > From: mitch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [klaatumail] Re: pandora.com plays a version of Calling Occupants at > a noticeably reduced pitch > Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:03:18 -0700 > To: klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Dave and Jaimie, > > Hey thanks for the thoughts on that slow Klaatu track! > > Some other musings: > > - Pandora.com never existed as anything other than a pure digital > radio outlet, so there was probably no 'transition' from vinyl for them > > - Their catalog displays metadata for each track (such as the name of > the album of origin) that will hot link you to more information about > that particular album, group, or song, including a link over to > iTunes or Amazon to buy it, both in CD and often MP3 download formats > (I think Jaimie will like that). This seems to imply that they spent > some time developing a proprietary library, or they made a deal with > iTunes or Amazon to access their digitized libraries. > > - The version I heard of "Calling Occupants..." did not seem to be > transferred from vinyl (if so, it was the cleanest vinyl ever), and > the mix was a little too good (e.g. clarified and up front) not to be > the remastered one that you guys did for the 3:47 EST reissue in this > decade. > > I'm particularly intrigued by Jaimie's comment: > > > Sounds to me like someone ripped the album track at poor MP3 > > quality...a side effect of which is, on occasion, a slower playback > > speed. > > Hmmm I've never heard that - but I also don't rip below 128 kbps ever > (and I don't often rip, period). That's interesting! > > And Dave's comment about the digitizing process: > > > I also know of a certain record label that took a 48 > > KHz wav file and put it directly onto a CD-R test pressing via some > > software that didn't automatically detect it was putting the wrong > > sample rate file on an audio CD and actually transferred the 48 KHz > > data > > as 44.1 KHz data with no conversion, making the playback sound slow > > and > > just plain "wrong". :-) It can happen in the digital age with as > > much > > ease as it happened in the analog age. > > I suspect one of these is what's going on here. In the plus column, > the effect, as I said, is not so bad as to ruin the track to my ears > (so pandora still might end up turning someone on to Klaatu with this > admittedly imperfect rendition). Dave actually points out in his post > one of my most hated vinyl distortions: eccentric pressings (the hole > is not centered). This was RAMPANT on 45s, moreso than LPs, and my > brother and I, at his record store, used to carefully select our > copies to NOT have this defect. With some pressings, you would find a > whole case or lot that was defective in this way. Since there were 2 > sides, sometimes the problem would only be on one side (annoying). > And Dave points out that it sure was way worse when you got to the > center of a record versus the beginning outer edge, particularly with > LPs where the linear velocity is at its smallest ratio relative to > the perpendicular velocity of the offcenter pressing toward the end > of the side (due to the larger size disc). Many vinyl collectors will > accept varying degrees of other defects to avoid this one in > particular - it's a dealbreaker to a lot of people's ears. > > Oh- and thanks for not assuming I was just so high or something that > I was hearing things (hahaha)! > > -Mitch > Santa Rosa, CA > _________________________________________________________________ Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that?s right for you. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290