> Mitch said that Pandora identified it as the > version FROM "3:47 EST". Can we assume then > that it ISN'T the single version? Agreed, BUT, how many radio stations can accurately tell you the source of their material? For example, a local FM station has their entire library on a server. They've got individual tracks, not complete albums/CDs. Some of it was sourced from vinyl when they made the transition to digital, some was sourced from CDs. If they state that it's from a specific album, how do we know that they can say that with any accuracy? Perhaps it was taken from a bad vinyl transfer? Perhaps it was taken from a pirated CD of 3:47 EST (yes, they exist, I have one)? Perhaps it was taken from an old cassette and played in a different cassette deck for the digital transfer. > If it's the LP version then it blows out your 'speed-up' theory. I didn't actually propose that they played the single version. I was just commenting on it being sped up and some radio stations in the 70s speeding up 45s even further, and that this combination would make that sound even faster. If you note, Mitch's original email indicated it sounded slower, not faster, or even MUCH faster. :-) I guess I just went off on a tangent when he mentioned being used to vinyl not always being played at an accurate speed. > Sounds to me like someone ripped the album track at poor > MP3 quality...a side effect of which is, on occasion, a > slower playback speed. Very true indeed! I also know of a certain record label that took a 48 KHz wav file and put it directly onto a CD-R test pressing via some software that didn't automatically detect it was putting the wrong sample rate file on an audio CD and actually transferred the 48 KHz data as 44.1 KHz data with no conversion, making the playback sound slow and just plain "wrong". :-) It can happen in the digital age with as much ease as it happened in the analog age. I guess the more things change, the more they stay the same, eh? :-) Dave