RE: my ver of jaws 9 is very sluggish often in word 2003, please need help
- From: "Starrett, Kimberly A., VBAPHILSDT" <kimberly.starrett@xxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 06:59:51 -0400
Try a newer version of Jaws (11 or 12) since Word 2003 technically isn't
compatible with Jaws 9.
Hth,
Kim
Kimberly Starrett
Product Development
Product Support Service (Benefits Product Support)
Insurance Product Division, Product Support Team 1
Philadelphia Regional Office and Insurance Center
Tel: 215-842-2000 x4321
Email: kimberly.starrett@xxxxxx
_____
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Hank & Patty
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 2:49 PM
To: jaws list
Subject: my ver of jaws 9 is very sluggish often in word 2003, please need
help
Hello,
My version of Jaws which is Jaws 9 is quite often quite sluggish to respond
when in word 2003. It seems to take forever to do simple word processing
tasks in a document because of this very sluggish response performance
problem of my Jaws 9 in word 2003, is quite frustrating, need help please on
how I can hopefully majorly improve the response of Jaws when in word 2003.
Have any of you out there had this same trouble with Jaws 9 in word 2003?
Does anyone know if improvements have been made to Jaws 10 or Jaws 11 to
make Jaws in those versions work with a much much quicker response time in
Ms-word 2003 and eliminate the very sluggish response of Jaws in earlier
versions in word 2003? I need to use word 2003 alot on a daily basis.
Please , if anyone can make some suggestions on how I can hopefully
eliminate this very sluggish response of Jaws in word 2003, and hopefully
just the opposite, make the response of Jaws very quick in word 2003,in my
daily word processing tasks, so it is not so frustrating and take forever to
do different document editing, whether it is download a newer Jaws version
or some other solution, I would be so thankful and would really appreciate
the help to fix this problem. Much thanks in advance for any help with
this.
All the best,
Hank W. Merchant
Other related posts:
