I can't think of a single reason to use 2.51 over 5.08, and I can think of several reasons to use 5.08 over 2.51. As far as accessibility goes, there is no problem whatsoever with 5.08. Since Winamp is a free program, there's also no need to take our word for it, you can easily try it and if you don't like it go back to the old version if that will somehow help. I can't even imagine the rationale behind using an old version like 2.51. Bruce -- Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: water_drinker@xxxxxxxx Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net For information on my weekly radio show visit http://radioclassics.ogts.net On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Moti Azrad Musician & Piano-Tuner wrote: > Hi to you, all. > I'm considering to start using winamp and In jfwlite website, I saw the > version 508 but one of my friends suggest me not to use it but to use the > previous winamp v251. > > I'd like to hear from you, the heavy winamp users. > > The most important thing, must be the accessibility of winamp with Jaws5.1 > and soon with Jaws v6.0 with xp pro os. > > Any help, is greatly appreciated > > Moti > > -- > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the > way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the > list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx