I used Jaws 9 and Outlook 2003 with no problems like that, it was after I installed the beta of 10 that Outlook 2003 started doing that, and it does not happen in Vista under 2007. I can no longer check it out in 2003 or XP as that computer is no longer in operation, it finally gave up on me completely after four years of loads of problems. However, In 2007 when I open a message to read it I get a wintrapping message that I never used to see, thought it could be related to the Focus display but I don't know that for sure. I kept hoping through the beta cycle it would get resolved. Rose Combs rosecombs@xxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Homuth Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 11:12 AM To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Update Re: Outlook 2003 and JAWS 10. Yesterday I made mention to the list that I was having a problem with JFW 10 incorrectly announcing unread messages in Outlook 2003 folders when there in fact were none, or no messages at all. In a conversation with Freedom Scientific this morning in response to the problem in question, we were able to varify the problem does not in fact occur with my version of JAWS 9.0. As the technical support department was unable to reproduce the problem, but saw from their end that the problem was produceable on my machine, they'll more than likely be referring this to their testing department. Since the technical support person was apparently unaware of the problem occuring in certain people's instalations of JAWS 9, I'd encourage anyone with that problem to report it to them as well. Recommended means of doing so would be by telephone, as they can then gain feedback confirmation from the instalation itself to varify the problem is happening, and likely not being caused by the version of Outlook installed on the computer. For the record, in JAWS 10, the technical support individual I spoke with at the end of the call could reproduce a similar problem on her machine, and believes the cause to be the same. I'll try and update the situation as I find out more. James, List Admin -- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx