Dear Shivlu, Thank you for your comments. Your inputs are valuable. Sivasubramanian M On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Shivlu Jain <shivlu.jain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just to add few more points: > 1.Dns64 load balancing > 2.Support of IPv6 DSLite > 3. Lawful Intercept ( right now no LI is defined for IPv6) > 4. NetFlow > > > Initially Service providers must go with NAT44 stateful and along with > this a planning has to be started to offer NAT64 and in the last Everything > must go on IPv6. > > Regards > Shivlu Jain > CISCO SYSTEMS INDIA (New Delhi) > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 19 Jan 2012, at 23:22, Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Last call for comments. We will summarize the comments this week. > > Thank you. > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Sivasubramanian M < <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx> > isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hello >>> >>> >>> Attached is a proposal from Brajesh Jain, President, ISOC India Delhi, >>> to be taken up by ISOC Chapters in India. Posted here for comments and >>> more suggestions. >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> >>> Sivasubramanian M >>> ISOC India Chennai >>> <http://isocindiachennai.org/>http://isocindiachennai.org >>> >>> <http://internetstudio.in/>http://internetstudio.in/ >>> >>> >> > <IPv6 pilot network for stakeholders enabling migration to IPv6 Nov27.doc> > >