[isalist] Re: Windows Server 2003 R2
- From: "Ball, Dan" <DBall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 23:38:49 -0400
W2K3 SP1, which makes me think that it is more like a feature pack
instead of a new OS, but they don't bill it that way. You have to
install W2K3 SP1, then upgrade it to R2 (CD2), whole new license key and
everything.
________________________________
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Steve Moffat
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 8:07 PM
To: ISA Mailing List
Subject: [isalist] Re: Windows Server 2003 R2
R2 CD1 is just plain old W2K3....
________________________________
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ball, Dan
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 8:31 PM
To: ISA Mailing List
Subject: [isalist] Re: Windows Server 2003 R2
It's just a thing I have that I like all servers to be the same version
whenever possible... *grin*
R2 seems more like a Feature Pack instead of a whole new system, so I'd
expect it wouldn't make a difference.
________________________________
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Steve Moffat
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 3:55 PM
To: ISA Mailing List
Subject: [isalist] Re: Windows Server 2003 R2
If your ISA server is already 2003, then what's the point?? Remember
it's a firewall, so the R2 bits are not necessary.
S
________________________________
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ball, Dan
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:53 PM
To: ISA Mailing List
Subject: [isalist] Windows Server 2003 R2
I'm looking at upgrading our servers to 2003 R2, is there any reason I
shouldn't upgrade the ISA server also?
Other related posts:
