I think I have some mail to send... ________________________________ From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thu 10/14/2004 5:28 AM To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Subject: [isalist] IPSec NAT-T is not recommended for Windows Server 2003 computers that are behind network address translators http://www.ISAserver.org Hey guys, What does the ISA brain trust make of this? Is this an ex post factor apologia for a bad design decision made with XP SP2, or a valid rationale for their decision? IPSec NAT-T is not recommended for Windows Server 2003 computers that are behind network address translators: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;885348 Tom www.isaserver.org/shinder Tom and Deb Shinder's Configuring ISA Server 2004 http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 MVP -- ISA Firewalls ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ ------------------------------------------------------ Other Internet Software Marketing Sites: World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com No.1 Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as: jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx All mail from this domain has been virus-scanned.
