Re: Hardening Reg vs ISA?
- From: "Jim Harrison" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:02:13 -0800
Hardening Reg vs ISA?Actually, that article only deals with two out of a whole
list of them.
Better that you read the KB from whence this article stems:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q315669
All of the settings are discussed and explanations given for the behavior of
each.
Regarding what settings ISA makes moot:
none, if the attack comes from inside (FFT)...
Jim Harrison
MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
http://isaserver.org/authors/harrison/
Read the books!
----- Original Message -----
From: Craft, Steve
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 06:45
Subject: [isalist] Hardening Reg vs ISA?
http://www.ISAserver.org
I just passed by this URI:
http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Print.cfm?ArticleID=23918
and it talks about ways to harden the Win2K Registry against various "new"
TCP/IP attacks.
Gurus, are any of these worth applying to an ISA perimeter host, or do the
various ISA Services do a good enough job?
Gurus, are any of these worth applying to web or database or mail servers
published behind/through the ISA box, or do ISA's server and web proxying
features make them not worth it? For example, I was thinking that a particular
attack at a web server would just be passed through by ISA to the published
host, in which case the published host would need updates.
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Other related posts:
