Hardening Reg vs ISA?
- From: "Craft, Steve" <SCraft@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'[ISAserver.org Discussion List]'" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:45:19 -0500
I just passed by this URI:
http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Print.cfm?ArticleID=23918
and it talks about ways to harden the Win2K Registry against various "new"
TCP/IP attacks.
Gurus, are any of these worth applying to an ISA perimeter host, or do the
various ISA Services do a good enough job?
Gurus, are any of these worth applying to web or database or mail servers
published behind/through the ISA box, or do ISA's server and web proxying
features make them not worth it? For example, I was thinking that a
particular attack at a web server would just be passed through by ISA to the
published host, in which case the published host would need updates.
Thanks.
Other related posts:
