[isalist] Re: Cache size on an ISA 2004 server
- From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 21:27:02 -0700
http://www.ISAserver.org
-------------------------------------------------------
Nope; bigger is not obviously better.
The only way you can determine this is to set some arbitrary size and
watch the reports to see how much content is delivered from cache.
There was once a starting point of ~100MB per user, but this is also
very generic.
It depends on your users browsing habits and whether or not the web
sites support caching of their content.
-----Original Message-----
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Glenn P. JOHNSTON
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 8:46 PM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] Cache size on an ISA 2004 server
HI,
Anyone got some good oil on an optimun size range for the cache on an
ISA server 2004.
There are 25 users, who are fairly web active doing research on various
topics, and 100 other average users.
BIGGER is obviously better, but there has to be some trade off's some
where.
So what's a good size 50M, 100M, 500M ??
All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/isalist/
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server Articles and Tutorials: http://www.isaserver.org/articles_tutorials/
ISA Server Blogs: http://blogs.isaserver.org/
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe visit http://www.isaserver.org/pages/isalist.asp
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
