On Thursday 07 March 2013 11:11 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Karthikeyan A K <mindaslab at gmail.com>That certification is Junk.
wrote:
I would like to arrange a competition of certificated ppl against theAnd, what would that prove ?
ones I have picked. :-)) .
I haven't seen a non junk certificated candidate yet. But there should
Truly almost all IT industry certifications
are junk. 99.999% of it . Even most people having engineering degree areLet me clarify this line of thought you have proposed - "almost all IT
junk. Perhaps we should rename certification program as justification
program. I myself thought a bunch of programmers in CTS for Java
certification and I knew it would produce junk. Just watched the
massacre of technology / love for knowledge right in front of my eyes.
industry certifications are junk". Wherein one can infer that there is
a small slice of certifications which are not "junk". Could you point
those out ? I'm certain that they'd be interesting in context of the
article.
They (computer engineers) should be able to understand and program
Now, you follow that statement with "most people having engineering
degree are junk". So, how do you validate who are not "junk" ?
Don't get what you say. I am quiet weak in deciphering old English.
But some corporations have circumvented this junkificationI am tempted to say "One swallow does not a summer make, nor one fine
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/rasheeda-bhagat/decoding-zohos-success/article4379158.ece
day; similarly one day or brief time of happiness does not make a
person entirely happy." But then again, you do have the chance to
posit Zoho as the black swan.
--
sankarshan mukhopadhyay
<https://twitter.com/#!/sankarshan>