[iiag] Re: Seperated Iiag library
- From: Alex Macri <admfav2012@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: iiag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:34:16 -0400
Sounds great.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Chris Harding <wablahflababablah@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> richteer and I, and possibly others (I know naught of all seedy backroom
> iiag discussions that occur) have been thinking that a seperate repository
> for the core library of iiag would be a better abstraction than the
> intermingled single repo we have.
>
> We could have all display front ends in their own repo, so no need to
> compile them all or pull in all deps. Separate client/server so networking
> need not pollute the build process and code base.
>
> Thoughts, concerns?
>
> I am also posting this text to the subreddit:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/iiag/comments/310upp/separate_libiiag/
>
Other related posts:
