[PCB_FORUM] Re: DRC

  • From: Jean-Charles TEYSSIER <jcteyssier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:50:53 +0200

William,

how do you compare Gerber and IPC netlist?

On sourclink i found only mention of gerbtool which is part of orcad suite, not allegro.

Jean-Charles

William Billereau a écrit :
Neither after DRC update, nor dbdoctor including shapes checks...
The only way to correct this was to move the cline and then the shape was 
updated.
But the problem was that I do not know that I have to slide the cline!

I had to write a skill routine to detect it.
(the Gerber/IPC netlist comparison detects it but unfortunately I forgot to run 
it!)

I was thinking that Cadence was knowing the problem but the solution number 
11328776 is not exactly the same problem.
It is also a "shape status falsely reported as up to date" but in my case it is also a 
"DRC status falsely reported as up to date"
The "fill mode" was set to "Disabled", no "Out of date" shape was reported and 
DRC were up to date!

        William.


Sourcelink:
Dynamic shape status falsely reported as up to date.

Error Message:
None

Problem statement:
I have an instance in which I have a dynamic shape define on a subclass of type plane with the negative artwork check box selected. When I change the subclass to conductor I can visually see that the dynamic shape has not dynamically cleared the component pins, but the Setup > Drawing Option > Out of date shape reports 0 shapes out of date. The Shapes (Dynamic Copper Pour) section of the Drawing option shows the Fill mode to be Smooth and the Update to Smooth button is grayed out. Toggling the radio button from smooth to disable to smooth does not enable the Update to smooth button.

Solution:
This issue has been reported in Master PCR 4020116 and is planned to be addressed in the 16.0 release, which is tentatively scheduled for release near the middle of 2007.

Workaround:
Select the dynamic shape and move it ix 0.
1. Select Edit > Move.
Adjust the Find filter tab so that only "Shapes" are selectable.
2. Select the dynamic shape.

3. On the Allegro PCB Editor command line enter:
        ix 0



-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:icu-pcb-forum-
bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jean-Charles TEYSSIER
Sent: 02 June, 2008 6:54 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: DRC

Everyting green AFTER a dbdoctor? (i do not look at green ligths, only
the summarry drawing generated with report after a dbdoctror; i am old
fashion...)
Wao! Great Bug...

JCharles

William Billereau a écrit :
I think that we could spend a lot of time to list all dangerous
Cadence behaviors.
I had to implement some controls to avoid really dangerous things.
The last one:
A positive shape connecting 5 powers and a net and Allegro status
still returns everything "green" .... even in 16.01!
And even after DRC update.
No problem: only 25 boards to repair (we succeeded.. if not, 20
boards to the wastebasket!)
And a customer who wants to kill us ;-)

Allegro absolutely needs to be checked with IPC netlist comparison!!

The problem is known at Cadence.... a fix is coming! ;-)

        William.



-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:icu-pcb-forum-
bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jean-Charles TEYSSIER
Sent: 02 June, 2008 6:29 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: DRC

Yes, old bugs reappears some times (specially on shapes... and
gerbers(import))
looks like someone ask for a different behavior for a command,
cadence
does it and brake something related (recent fillet's problems is an
exemple)
I have found an other thing very dangerous:
15.7, not yet in 16.x.
If you describe a spacing via2someting_else to a value (say 1mm) but
test via to 0.5mm (why not?), then test via value take precedence on
the
greater value.
This is how allegro works and hotline say it should not be
corrected....

Jean-Charles

William Billereau a écrit :

Hello again.

If it can help someone we found something interesting here:

We have 2 big boards (really big) with a lot of electrical

constraints

and special shapes (one is called horse shoe ;-)

When we want to update DRCs, the system runs with 50% of processor,
and then crashes or terminates without updating DRCs or saying that
system is out of memory ....

We send the biggest one to Cadence.

They replied that it took less than 5 minutes to update and

everything

is OK.

We tried to do it in another service, it runs, less than few

minutes..

We suspected that the setup was wrong... I tried to find, removing
SKILL, variable environment, ... It works when I remove a
environment
variable with PATH with some setup...

I found that if I remove our env file, it works but I cannot find
where exactly.

I have a look to Sourcelink and found a solution given for 15.2
with
a

PCR for 15.5.

So it cannot be this because we are in 15.7, test were done in
16.01.
The PCR should be present in these releases.

I try nevertheless: I removed the use_accurate_delay_calculation.

And ... it works!

(never mind: we successfully asked for a more powerful computer! ;-
)
Some bugs seem to reappear at Cadence...

Sourcelink said:

*Update DRC & Database Check run until system is out of memory*

*Error Message:*

Memory Error...

*Problem statement:*

When I run update *drc* or database check with *drc* enabled, the
*process* runs and runs

until I get a memory error. What can I do to fix this?

*Solution:*

In this case, the problem was cause by the variable
use_accurate_delay_calculation

being enabled. This has been reported in PCR 799814 and fixed in
the
15.5 release.

Workaround:

1) Disable use_accurate_delay_calculation from Setup > User

Preferences >

Signal_analysis and then run Update *DRC* or database check.

*/William Billereau/*/
CERN group TS / DEM
1211 Genève 23 Suisse///



/
Tel: (+4122) 76 73403// //
mail to: william.billereau@xxxxxxx

<mailto:william.billereau@xxxxxxx>///

-----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe/unsubscribe:
Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe

To view the archives of this list go to
//www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/

Problems or Questions:
Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe/unsubscribe:
Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe

To view the archives of this list go to
//www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/
Problems or Questions:
Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe/unsubscribe:
Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe

To view the archives of this list go to
//www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/

Problems or Questions:
Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe/unsubscribe: Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe

To view the archives of this list go to 
//www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/

Problems or Questions:
Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe/unsubscribe: Send a message to icu-pcb-forum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of subscribe or unsubscribe

To view the archives of this list go to 
//www.freelists.org/archives/icu-pcb-forum/

Problems or Questions:
Send an email to icu-pcb-forum-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: