[ibis-macro] Re: Truth table taken to the next level

  • From: <fangyi_rao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 00:00:59 -0600

Hi, Arpad;


I think your second table is also correct. I just want to point out that
the current BIRD explicitly states that if GetWave_Exists=False,
Use_Init_Output must be True. Although it won't change the logic of the
table, those X's for Use_Init_Output when GetWave_Exists=False should be
replaced by True.





From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:57 PM
To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-macro] Truth table taken to the next level


Dear AMI experts, 
I cleaned up the spreadsheet with the truth table that we discussed 
in our ATM meeting today.  It looks like this now: 


I hope I got it right this time. 

The next thing I would like to do is to extend this table 
and spell out how these conditions can be applied to Tx 
and Rx independently.  In other words, I don't believe 
that our intent was to require these Booleans to be the 
same for both Tx and Rx.  But how many combinations are 

We have four (4) combinations per buffer, and we have two 
buffers, which could theoretically allow 4^2 = 16 total 
possibilities.  Are they all valid? 




PNG image

PNG image

Other related posts: