Hi Michael,
This is indeed an interesting idea, and it will be a great improvement related
to IBIS quality (for AMI models), I think.
In my experience, AMI users often face the different results given by different
simulators. This new feature would at least give a model vendor's expectation
for the simulations using given test fixture/channel.
Should we also consider adding the parameter settings (if differ than the
defaults in .ami file), Eye Opening/BER for the defined fixture/channel?
Also, there are some "complains" about the IBIS file size (too large due to
[Test data]). We could use this opportunity to redefine waveform attachment for
the [Test data].
My 2 cents,
Best regards,
Lance Wang
-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On
Behalf Of Mirmak, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 5:27 PM
To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-macro] Slides, Thoughts on AMI Support for [Test Data]/[Test
Load]
EXTERNAL
Please find enclosed my slides from today's IBIS-ATM meeting, regarding
expanding the existing [Test Data] and [Test Load] keywords to support AMI
model testing. I greatly appreciate the thoughtful feedback and suggestions,
and will incorporate them into any eventual BIRD.
Please note that the material is solely my own and does not necessarily
represent the views of my employer or any other person or organization.
- MM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website : http://ibis.org/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: unsubscribe
