Walter, We certainly (in IBIS) allow buffers to have different power and ground connections to the driver and the clamps. However, I've never modeled an I/O that is like this, so maybe someone else can provide an example? I've modeled devices where the I/Os are designed to work at multiple voltages (2.5V or 1.8V), but the output driver and clamps are connected to the same rail (VCCQ). On those same devices, the Address/Command inputs are connected to VCC, so you could be operating the bus at say 1.8V but the Input's clamps were connected to 2.5V. In this case, I could still describe the power and ground connections to the I/O and Inputs with just power_ref and gnd_ref labels. Randy From: Walter Katz [mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 4:23 PM To: Randy Wolff (rrwolff); IBIS-Interconnect Subject: RE: New keyword [Buffer Rail Mapping] Randy, I agree with the changes but why: Each line must contain either three, five or six entries. Three entries would be for pulldown_ref, pullup_ref. Can one have a pulldown_ref and a gnd_clamp_ref and they be different? Can one have a pullup_ref and a power_clamp_ref and they be different? Why can we not simplify and have: Sub-Params: power_ref, gnd_ref, ext_ref Walter From: Randy Wolff (rrwolff) [mailto:rrwolff@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 6:14 PM To: Walter Katz; IBIS-Interconnect Subject: RE: New keyword [Buffer Rail Mapping] Walter, I made some editorial changes. Let me know if these don't make sense to you. Thanks, Randy From: ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 2:25 PM To: IBIS-Interconnect Subject: [ibis-interconn] New keyword [Buffer Rail Mapping] All, This is a new [Buffer Rail Mapping] keyword section. Walter Walter Katz wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx> Phone 303.449-2308 Mobile 303.335-6156