Weston,
Thanks for taking the minutes. I would like to request two changes:
"It will be voted on in the open forum this Friday."
I don't think we said/expected that. I think we said that we will schedule it
for a vote in the upcoming Open Forum Meeting for the following meeting...
I would also change these sentences a little:
"Arpad noted that the BIRD, beyond clarifying
the text of the specification, adds some comments that might change the
technical requirements in the specification. A DQS executable must be available
in simulation if a DQ model needs clock times input. The initial specification
of this functionality allowed the EDA tool to assume some clock_times input if
the DQS (clock source) model was not included in the simulation."
to (or something similar):
"Arpad noted that one of the changes in the BIRD, might be viewed as a
technical change, because it makes the DQS executable model required
even for the "Wave" case. Currently the DQS executable model is only
required for the "Times" case and the EDA tool is allowed to pass a
waveform into the clock_times input if the DQS (clock source) model
is not available for the simulation."
Thanks,
Arpad
===============================================================
From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Beal, Weston
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 11:30 AM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] task group meeting minutes 16 NOV 2022
All,
The minutes from the IBIS Editorial task group held last Wednesday are attached.
Regards,
Weston
