Michael,
Looks good below, but I would put
Direction: Rx, Tx
Bob
From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 5:09 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Re: Quick check on formatting for pre-emptive
BIRD178.2 merge
MM,
Other than Rx being Rx, I think this is file. For completnes:
Direction: Rx
Direction: Tx
Direction: Rx and Tx
Walter
From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mirmak, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 7:44 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Quick check on formatting for pre-emptive
BIRD178.2 merge
Per some recent meetings and offline discussions, if we pre-emptively
incorporate BIRD178.2 into the next draft of IBIS 6.1, we have to decide
what format to use to indicate direction. I propose the following, using
Rx_Noise as an example. Is it acceptable? Any alternatives?
Note that the table of directions will still be included, as a reference.
- MM
Parameter: Rx_Noise
Required: No, and illegal before AMI_Version 6.0
Direction: Rx
Descriptors:
Usage: Info, Out, Dep
Type: Float
Format: Value, List, Range, Corner, Increment, Steps
Default: <numeric_literal>
Description: <string>
Definition: The standard deviation, in Volts, of a white Gaussian
random process, which is to be added by the EDA tool to the signal measured
at the sampling latch of a receiver.
- MM
