Hi, > Hi, > > On 26/02/12 16:34, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 09:52:17AM +0000, Miika Komu wrote: > >> Diego, I believe Xin has addressed the main issues, can we proceed to > >> merge? We will continue to polish the library but we'd like to a get a > >> more stable base for further work. > > No, the branch still has pending needs-fixing reviews and central issues > > like the naming remain undecided. > > > > > > What is your opinion related to this naming issue? Previous we propose > to call it libhipl instead of libhipdaemon. > Since it will requires some efforts to change this, I hope we can agree > on a new name soon. I suggested earlier: * lib/hipl for the directory hierarchy * libhipl.{so.a} for the resulting binary Diego, what say ye? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~hipl-core/hipl/libhip/+merge/93782 Your team HIPL core team is subscribed to branch lp:hipl.