On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:39:53PM +0200, Xin Gu wrote: > On 16/02/12 13:02, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:03:24PM +0200, Xin Gu wrote: > >>On 13/02/12 13:33, Diego Biurrun wrote: > >>>And that was a *huge* bug that you amplified a hundredfold in this > >>>merge request. Fixed. hipfw does not and must not depend on hipd > >>>code. Your build system changes must reflect this and you must not > >>>make hipfw depend on hipd with "autotools" handwaving. > >>The diff result below shows one approach I find for this issue. > >>The idea is building midauth_builder.c into an intermediate lib and > >>later linking it to both libhipdaemon.la and hipfw. > >>Do you think it is ok? > >No, it does not. Now there is one extra, completeley senseless, library > >containing only one object file. Do you realize we already build a library > >with the common code (libhipcore)? That's where common code should go, not > >in second library for common code. Also, I already fixed the issue. > > Could you tell me where can I find your fix? There is no any new > commit from you in the trunk. I committed it, but forgot to push. Done now. Diego