On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:53:01PM +0300, Xin Gu wrote:
On 12/05/12 14:00, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:13:17AM +0300, Xin Gu wrote:
On 11/05/12 00:55, Diego Biurrun wrote:
@@ -202,6 +166,47 @@
+lib_hipl_libhipl_la_SOURCES = lib/hipl/accessor.c \
+ lib/hipl/lhipl.c \
+ lib/hipl/lhipl_sock.c \
+ lib/hipl/lhipl_operations.c \
Why this lhipl prefix?
It is a short form for libhipl. This prefix can help to identify src
code files related to libhipl.
There is no need to identify files in the libhipl directory as belonging
to libhipl. What else would they belong to? We don't have hipfw_ and
hipd_ prefixes in the hipd/ and hipfw/ directories.
I was not so clear in previous reply. This prefix aims to identify
src code files related to library-based HIP.
Maybe it was not clear enough in my previous reply: We have a directory
to identify source code files related to librarized HIPL, there is no
need for a prefix.
