[HUG ] Re: New Issue Victor is out there......
- From: Wilko Bulte <wb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:26:10 +0200
Quoting peter jensen, who wrote on Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 08:07:39AM -0400 ..
> ---- <hasselblad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Worth reading is a comparison of CF lenses with the new Digital lenses.....
> > LOTS of marketing hype.....
> >
>
> To anyone who reads Victor, what's the upshot? How DO they compare (CF vs.
> digiplastik)?
>
> I noted this at the Hasselblad USA website: "All HC lenses are engineered to
> ensure optimal performance and image quality, whether using film or digital."
> But then you oughta use Phocus (does this cost extra?)for "Digital lens
> corrections for color aberration, distortion and vignetting."
>
> Elsewhere, "Carl Zeiss [CF] lenses produce unbeatable image contrast and
> color saturation - superior quality, ultimate flexibility, and no
> compromises." Unlike, say, digital? Just wondering.
C/CF era: lenses better be OK on their own. If it does not get onto film
in a decent fashion you were basically foo-bared.
H era: lenses can be a bit less stellar "because we can tweak it with the
computer in post-process".
Something like that?
Wilko
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
