[hashcash] considering hashcash

  • From: Atom 'Smasher' <atom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:12:00 -0400 (EDT)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

i've been keeping an eye on hashcash for a few months, but haven't started using it yet. maybe someone here can convince me start... here's why i've been sitting on the sidelines...


1) no support in pine. i could write my own script to handle outgoing mail (or ~maybe~ even use hashcash-sendmail).


2) no support in qmail. i could write my own script to handle incoming mail and run it from a dot-qmail file, and then consider an email good or pass it to CRM114 for filtering.

3) hardly anyone uses it. this is the lamest reason not to use it, especially since i hate it when people say that about pgp.

4) spammers have us out-gunned. with >80% of spam coming from zombied windoze boxes, spammers have a lot of cycles to find collisions. it may slow down a spammer to generate hash based postage, but if the protocol catches on, spammers will start using it... (it seems that most windoze users have become accustomed to their machines running at full load).

5) CRM114 is giving me ~99.9% accuracy. this is a highly demotivating factor for filtering/screening my mail through anything else. i recently had a friend fwd a spam to me, so i could check it out... a brutal test for any spam filter... the message was classified as spam, but only by a *VERY* slim score. if we were both using hashcash that wouldn't have happened, but that type of situation is rare.


...atom

 _________________________________________
 PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
 -------------------------------------------------

        "Vietnam was the first war ever fought without
         any censorship. Without censorship, things can
         get terribly confused in the public mind."
                -- General William Westmoreland
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?
Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJBKsAXAAoJEAx/d+cTpVciiScH/ROSKXukJ/V2/6afddK35fBY
jHExdGn7ubBGrOxkwaWRfO+HDpW4mfz/P/l6btt3+R3HMM9/4Z/apOAbBO69k+gI
KzLBDdTzDHA2pEAm1f6CvWbStLfXC6EkGtGqk87R6JkhM1M0qTpuDAWZkGStmCES
DA0HaiYsnvkasORA26ZqRMS1hTyTCz/28CJICYUhearcrS1wZb0t1ENhkNwAC273
pCBFfqIuDRQfimqpyhZtrpxSk8cEbpVLg6EivpV5I8kKpnb6aCLWJU+er2SWq1ih
XhITIhiw4jDMhorCH529Vy/PYE0sDb2YX0FyWumaH9plzXgoCAKNPsTpkNPCxf4=
=yqu8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Other related posts: