[openbeos] Re: SV: Re: gcc 3.3.x or newer
- From: Cian Duffy <myob87@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:16:00 +0000
Any course in C at entry-level will work fine with GCC 2.95.3
If your desperate, GCC3 builds FOR C ONLY work on BeOS - shard ported
it. You cannot use C++ though. Look for "ahwachaikah", or something
similarly unspellable, on BeShare.
Also, BeOS has portable.net now, so if you must do C#, you can.
Cian
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:08:12 +0100, Fredrik Modéen
<fredrik.moden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ok so it would not run :)
> Don't know gcc or .NET was ok (he could not say for chore about .NET but
> not Studio C++ 6.0 or gcc pre 3.3).
>
> I'm not gone use any OS specific libraries just ANSI/ISO 1997.
>
> Its not that important to make it in BeOS (did the c curse in BeOS)but
> it would be nice :)
>
> I'm not leaving BeOS for this ;)
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För François Revol
> Skickat: den 29 november 2004 18:39
> Till: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Ämne: [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.3.x or newer
>
> > Hi (sorry to disturb you in the making of Hiku)
> >
> > Does any one know if gcc 3.3.x or newer can run on beos or Zeta? If
> > it
> > is, can we run the programs made with it and have some one made a
> > binary?
> it could be made to run but is useless for now since it would produce
> binaries incompatible with current R5 libraries.
> Be had a workign gcc3 AFAIK.
>
> > The c++ curse I'm reading knead gcc 3.3.x or newer, have something to
> > do
> > with that 2.9 is not really ANSI/ISO 1997 standard.
> >
> There is no reason to not use gcc2.95 for that.
> Except if you do classes in ASM and use mangled symbols using the gcc3
> ABI
> that you need to link to :D
> else it's not a C++ course it's a gcc3 course.
>
> François.
>
>
Other related posts:
