Didn't we just get the same question last week? On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Jerry Babione <jerry.babione@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Haiku can be a dream come true. It is just that for many. I realize that > there are issues. There will always be issues. Software doesn't write > itself. There are areas where I'm 30 years behind the power curve and > other areas where my business runs and creates state of the are. The > situation changes everyday. Do I have clients still using BeOS 5r3,yes. > That alone makes Haiku worth waiting for. The older systems were built to > last, where as now we plan replacements because the hardware quits. The PC > I'm typing on now was manufactured in 1999. I use it, not because I don't > have newer, because it works every time, without a hiccup. Reguardless of > which OS I decide to use with it. That's what BeOS has been to those > clients still using it. That's what we want from Haiku which in their minds > and hearts is BeOS's successor. > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>wrote: > >> On 11/29/2013 11:20 PM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. wrote: >> >>> There have been other emails on this list with the same thought... the >>> point being is that Haiku is an open-source OS. It can never really die. >>> I would just sit tight and wait for google summer of code to kick off >>> again. Things like that spark interest in small projects like this and >>> produce more and more dedicated developers. Haiku isn't dead, but only >>> dormant. >>> >> >> That might seem so from the POV of an end user who is waiting for >> official releases, but while there have been some rather quiet periods >> since the last release, there also has been quite some activity. ATM two >> developers work full time on Haiku, there's GCI going on with lots of >> contributions, and other developers keep hacking in their spare time. >> "Dormant" certainly doesn't fit. >> >> CU, Ingo >> >> >> > > > -- > Jerry Babione > Founder-Just Plain Folks Org. Inc. >