[openbeos] Re: BObjectList vs. TypedList

  • From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 21:23:45 +0100 CET

"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm all for it, though we should probably rather wait till R2. Better 
> not add too much potential for problems with the release that is 
> basically intended to clone BeOS R5.

Yes, I think you are right, we should add as less as possible (to the 
user API).

> > No, not DriveSetup, *DiskProbe* - the hex editor that come with 
> > BeOS. 
> > The Device API is widely used in the applications shipped by Be.
> You're sure, that it does? At least mine doesn't seem to (`strings 
> Device' produces nothing suspicious). Besides the three ones 
> mentioned 
> earlier, Installer, CDBurner, bootman, clockconfig (for whatever 
> reason) and writembr show signs of usage of the API.

Well, I thought it would, but apparently, I was wrong :-)
You are right again, it doesn't use the private Device API, I just 
checked :)

Adios...
   Axel.



Other related posts: