"Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm all for it, though we should probably rather wait till R2. Better > not add too much potential for problems with the release that is > basically intended to clone BeOS R5. Yes, I think you are right, we should add as less as possible (to the user API). > > No, not DriveSetup, *DiskProbe* - the hex editor that come with > > BeOS. > > The Device API is widely used in the applications shipped by Be. > You're sure, that it does? At least mine doesn't seem to (`strings > Device' produces nothing suspicious). Besides the three ones > mentioned > earlier, Installer, CDBurner, bootman, clockconfig (for whatever > reason) and writembr show signs of usage of the API. Well, I thought it would, but apparently, I was wrong :-) You are right again, it doesn't use the private Device API, I just checked :) Adios... Axel.