+1 2010/2/5 Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> > 2010/2/5 Ralf Schülke <ralf.schuelke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > clang is gcc compatible ;-) > > > > That's not really interesting or relevant though, you don't gain much > by using the clang front end with the gcc backend except possibly > somewhat better error messages. LLVM is interesting for all the > backend optimizations it enables, and that's why having Clang be more > complete was so crucial to it actually being viable/useful for our > project. > > Regards, > > Rene > >