On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:04:09 -0500, Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2010/2/5 Ralf Schülke <ralf.schuelke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Hi, > > i listen about the project clnag and LLVM, here the url > > http://clang.llvm.org/ > > It this a good alternative to gcc2/gcc4 ? > > In the long term that's probably going to be desirable, but at the > moment Clang's C++ support is far from being good enough for our > purposes. > Time to look again I think. As of yesterday clang+llvm is self hosting, passing 100% of its test suite[1]. Given the compexity of the C++ in clang and llvm, I suspect haiku is probably in a compileable state or close to it. [1] http://blog.llvm.org/2010/02/clang-successfully-self-hosts.html