> On March 10, 2014 at 6:35 PM Jonathan Schleifer > <js-haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any opinions on this? This would give us the best of both worlds: > > * We would have small packages to transfer and save a *lot* of bandwidth. > * There would be no extra "Decompressing package" step. > * We would not have a performance penalty. Have you actually tested the performance penalty on old hardware? It doesn't matter much if you cannot read from packages <300 MB/s on modern hardware either; application data usually isn't large to begin with, and is afterwards cached in RAM. > The only problem that I know of would be: > "What about packages that are not hosted in a repository?" You missed: "Wasting a lot of disk space with uncompressed packages". With today's SSDs, this is actually a problem again. I for one prefer to keep them compressed on my disks. Bye, Axel.