On 2009-05-27 at 22:41:12 [+0200], Jonas Sundström <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Would it be preferred if I reverted my recent URL > changes (BUrl, /bin/urlwrapper, /bin/open) > or work toward something like java.net.URI? > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/net/URI.html It's not a pressing issue, but for a public API this would be nicer. > How about the URL opening method I suggested that > optionally allows for a user dialog (when the URL > handler is unset or missing); would it be okay to > provide such a function as part of the support kit, > as a free-standing function? As written before, I would put the functionality to launch an application by URL into BRoster where it fits perfectly, IMHO. I would keep the dialog functionality separate and put it (as class or function) into the interface kit. CU, Ingo