On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > Since get_thread_info() for the current thread normally cannot fail, if a > pointer to valid storage for the thread info is provided, the easiest > solution is probably to change the code in the BReferenceable destructor to > skip the debugger call when get_thread_info() fails. OTOH it is worth Will do that, was afraid of potentially allowing valid failures to pass through by doing so but that shouldn't be an issue if that's correct. > checking why the heuristic doesn't work in this case, since neither > resume_thread() nor the Signal destructor seem to use a lot of stack. Will see what I can find out :). Thanks for the answer, Rene