Quoth "Axel =?utf-8?q?D=C3=B6rfler?=" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: ... | What could also cause this is if we are just rewriting the same file | instead of replacing it. "cp" for example just does that - in this | case, code that isn't currently paged in will see the new binary | whenever it gets there. Linux has the same problem, btw. | So we could either change our build system to properly replace the | files (ie. by passing the --remove-destination option to it, in case it | supports that), or let the VM handle this case gracefully (see MAP=5FCOPY | for more info: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0110.1/1506.html | - in case you want to have a good read). Despite Linus' slight aversion | against MAP=5FCOPY, I think this would actually be the preferred method | (but for executables; I agree it doesn't really make sense as a | replacement for read()). I skimmed that thread, and came away with the impression that at least on Linux, VM is not a perfect place to solve this kind of problem, and instead you might look at the filesystem - some kind of copy-on-write mirroring. This would work even when the old system is mapping files AFTER the update has started. I would be happy to explain what I mean by that, but for the very simplest thing, though, would it work to unpack to /boot/beos-new/, and rename that /boot/beos/ during shutdown? This would be hard on 3rd party applications that install or update files in /boot/beos, but that ought to be discouraged anyway. Donn