[haiku-development] Re: Haiku R1A4 Postmortem

  • From: Sean Collins <smc.collins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:34:43 -0500

looncraz wrote:
So, Sean, are you saying to do (basically) the following when an alpha (or even beta) release is scheduled:

Days till release - Action

14    -    Branch the source & Feature freeze
14    -    Build RC for review and evaluation
14    -    Release RC to developers, encouraging adoption and bug-hunting

13 - 7    -    Apply patches as needed - critical issues ONLY
6-3 - Determine if some features need to be disabled for safety / image
2-1        -    Pre-release for last-minute testing.
0    -    RELEASE!

That said, most any random nightly from Haiku is in generally good shape, the only real problem is that there is no true community effort involved in the release. Requesting EVERY Haiku-interested party to download and search for problems (on the mailing lists - no mass public requests) should be priority. Indeed, Haiku needs to integrate an issue-reporting mechanism into these builds...




yes, but further more then that, I think anything that is experimental, should be done out of the trunk and in a branch in general. Lots of folks are now treating the nightly's as bug fix alphas. When code stabilizes, move it to the trunk etc. At this point Haiku minus about 59 tickets, is looking fairly decent for a beta cycle. Unless the road map page in trac is incorrect ?

Community wide participation would reduce the likelihood of bugs in any beta or alpha release in general.

Sean

Other related posts: