Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > I believe you're better off to just to port everything to gcc 4 > Haiku, > first. This will likely give you less porting problems (though gcc 4 > Haiku > might not work as well as the version compiled with 2.95.3). When the > port > gets usable, you can start considering what to do about the gcc > 2.95.3 > issue. Maybe Haiku R1 will already exist at the point and the > migration > path to gcc 4 would be much clearer. That's pretty much exactly what I would have set :-) Bye, Axel.