> Adrien Destugues wrote: > > Hello, > > I've just updated the coding guidelines checker (vim script > > version) on > > the trac wiki. It should have less false positives and detect some > > more > > violations. It would be nice if someone could merge the new regexps > > in > > the python version. > > > > > Hi Adrien, thanks for the heads up, i'll have a look. Though i wonder > if > the exact same false positives happen in the python checker as i > changed > some regexps since the original 1:1 port. By the way, you should > have a > look too, my checker has more rules than yours :-D Ok, I backported the new rules in the vim script. I also made a small test file I'm going to add to subversion.