On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:52 PM, <pete.goodeve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yehbut... I'm not sure how I'd do that. I don't want to overwrite > the earlier version as -- aside from xicon -- it seems to work better. > I suppose I could find some intermediate version and try that, replacing > 30629, but again that could get very tedious. Tedious yes... A binary search would suggest you start with a revision in the middle of the two you already know, etc. Even if you can eliminate 3/4 of those revisions with two more tests, that's something :) - Urias