Clemens<clemens.zeidler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2011 22:53:48 +1200, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > A late reply: what about AttributesFilter? Or even AddAttributesFilter? > actually I think HaikuMailFormatFilter is not to bad because it takes the > raw message and sets the attributes, the mimetype and rename the file into > > something meaningful. Raw format -> haiku format... It doesn't change the format on disk, and there is no such thing as a Haiku mail format either - that's why I think it's a bad name. But if it also renames the file, AttributesFilter is not accurate either. Does it make any sense to have this as a separate filter, anyway? (the name "filter" doesn't really fit either) Bye, Axel.