[haiku-commits] Re: r36378 - haiku/branches/releases/r1alpha2/build/jam
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:23:02 +0200
On 2010-04-20 at 20:13:41 [+0200], Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Answering to myself ...
>
> On 2010-04-20 at 20:00:58 [+0200], Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > > That's the release branch BTW.
> >
> > Hm, do you mean I shouldn't have committed there, but sent you the patch
> > instead?
>
> Well, forget it, I should have committed that to trunk, of course. I was
> under
> the impression that adding r1a2 packages to trunk could cause compatibility
> problems due to the different ABI declarations, but I suppose that's not
> true,
> right? I still find that unclean, though.
Besides that the trunk will always be ahead of the release branch, since R1
alpha 3 (or whatever comes next) is supposed to be backwards compatible to
alpha 2 I wouldn't consider that unclean at all. The same holds for packages
built under r1a1.
> Should I revert r36378 then and apply it to trunk instead?
I just merged it back to the trunk.
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
