Answering to myself ... On 2010-04-20 at 20:00:58 [+0200], Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That's the release branch BTW. > > Hm, do you mean I shouldn't have committed there, but sent you the patch > instead? Well, forget it, I should have committed that to trunk, of course. I was under the impression that adding r1a2 packages to trunk could cause compatibility problems due to the different ABI declarations, but I suppose that's not true, right? I still find that unclean, though. Should I revert r36378 then and apply it to trunk instead? cheers, Oliver