On Tuesday, 18 November 2014, Adrien Destugues <pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:29:05PM +0100, Ithamar R. Adema wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Can't we just make our partitioning systems less wordy about the > obvious > > > failures (like: I don't understand this partition)? > > > Unless there is some actual failure, there shouldn't really be any > output. > > > > > > A real failure should have output of course, but wouldn't it make more > > sense for these modules to only output information on _success_? Not > > recognizing a partition format for these add-ons should be more common > then > > actually finding a match ;) > > The only exception there is the intel/gpt situation, where both will > > recognize, but the intel one already checks for GPT and outputs a > one-liner > > saying basically "recognized but ignoring"... > > This is not the only exception. Some audio CDs with a data track are > recognized as valid by both CDDA, ISO9660, and Session. Session has an > higher priority, and reexposes two partitions, which ISO9660 and CDDA > can scan again to find their respective data. > > Mixed ISO9660/HFS CDs are also possible. The ISO9660 filesystem > leaves the first 32K on the disk free to allow another filesystem header > to be written there. So in some extreme cases, a CD could be identified > succesfully by 3 filesystems and one partitionning system. > I might be able to acquire such a disc. At previous workplace, Vectorworks installation DVD is similar; just doesn't have audio.