On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Can't we just make our partitioning systems less wordy about the obvious > failures (like: I don't understand this partition)? > Unless there is some actual failure, there shouldn't really be any output. A real failure should have output of course, but wouldn't it make more sense for these modules to only output information on _success_? Not recognizing a partition format for these add-ons should be more common then actually finding a match ;) The only exception there is the intel/gpt situation, where both will recognize, but the intel one already checks for GPT and outputs a one-liner saying basically "recognized but ignoring"... Ithamar.