Am 29.07.2014 22:36, schrieb Augustin Cavalier:
On 07/29/2014 04:06 PM, Stephan Aßmus wrote:Please update the packages with proper information about them. I don't want to google the package name when the description should have been right there in the package.This is actually a growing problem that quite a lot of packages don't say what they are for. Some have one-liners, some have a paragraph, and some have FIVE paragraphs (e.g. xz-utils was this way, before I cut it down to its current state). This once again raises the problem that we have no style guide for packages...
I guess you are right. It seems so unfortunate that one can't rely on common sense. Like, uhm, 'description' is where you *describe* the package. No, we have to explicitely say "describe" means to "tell what it is good for".
Best regards, -Stephan