Fine with me. With respect to 3.4, I strongly suggest that "support realtime performance" be changed to "primarily support real-time performance but also support off-line performance. Note endings shall be unambiguously linked with their proper note beginnings in such a way as to support multiple voices for the same instrument on the same pitch, attacking at the same or different instants and releasing at the same or different instants. In other words, GMPI shall fully support polyphony including polyphony of unisons." -----Original Message----- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Nov 23, 2003 4:47 PM To: GMPI list <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [gmpi] Moving on? Are we ready to move on? I'm going to check in the draft with all the updates that we've made to Sections 3.1 to 3.3. Then we can move on to 3.4 -- Notice that as computers are becoming easier and easier to use, suddenly there's a big market for "Dummies" books. Cause and effect, or merely an ironic juxtaposition of unrelated facts? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe