[gmpi] Re: Moving on?
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 14:19:24 -0800
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 08:52:53PM -0500, Michael Gogins wrote:
> With respect to 3.4, I strongly suggest that "support realtime
> performance" be changed to "primarily support real-time performance but
> also support off-line performance. Note endings shall be unambiguously
> linked with their proper note beginnings in such a way as to support
> multiple voices for the same instrument on the same pitch, attacking at
> the same or different instants and releasing at the same or different
> instants. In other words, GMPI shall fully support polyphony including
> polyphony of unisons."
I know you want to get stuff about note IDs in there, and they will be. But
everything you wrote beyond "support off-line performance" is OT for now :)
I'll change #11 to read:
GMPI must be primarily aimed at realtime processing systems, but must also
support offline processing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
