[gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 11:09:38 -0400
>a) If a buffer is actually silent (contains all zeroes), then the host
>can optioanlly set the silent flag.
where's the flag? i'm with steve in supporting a flag on the port. i
also believe (perhaps incorrectly) that any given call to the
equivalent of the "process()" method of the plugin supplies 1 and only
1 buffer per port.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
- » [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.3 (was 7.4, but 7.3 was too detailed)
